Skip to content

L
linux
Commit 86a41ea9 authored by James Chapman's avatar James Chapman Committed by Jakub Kicinski
Browse files
Options

l2tp: fix lockdep splat 

When l2tp tunnels use a socket provided by userspace, we can hit
lockdep splats like the below when data is transmitted through another
(unrelated) userspace socket which then gets routed over l2tp.

This issue was previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87sfialu2n.fsf@cloudflare.com/

The solution is to have lockdep treat socket locks of l2tp tunnel
sockets separately than those of standard INET sockets. To do so, use
a different lockdep subclass where lock nesting is possible.

  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  6.10.0+ #34 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  iperf3/771 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8881027601d8 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(slock-AF_INET/1);
    lock(slock-AF_INET/1);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  10 locks held by iperf3/771:
   #0: ffff888102650258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x1a/0x40
   #1: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0
   #2: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130
   #3: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   #4: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0xf9/0x260
   #5: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10
   #6: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0
   #7: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130
   #8: ffffffff822ac1e0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0xcc/0x1450
   #9: ffff888101f33258 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock#2){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1450

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 771 Comm: iperf3 Not tainted 6.10.0+ #34
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0
   dump_stack+0xc/0x20
   __lock_acquire+0x135d/0x2600
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2a0
   ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   ? __skb_checksum+0xa3/0x540
   _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x35/0x50
   ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   l2tp_eth_dev_xmit+0x3c/0xc0
   dev_hard_start_xmit+0x11e/0x420
   sch_direct_xmit+0xc3/0x640
   __dev_queue_xmit+0x61c/0x1450
   ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130
   ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ip_output+0x99/0x120
   __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0
   ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890
   __tcp_send_ack+0x1b8/0x340
   tcp_send_ack+0x23/0x30
   __tcp_ack_snd_check+0xa8/0x530
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   tcp_rcv_established+0x412/0xd70
   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x299/0x420
   tcp_v4_rcv+0x1991/0x1e10
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x50/0x220
   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x158/0x260
   ip_local_deliver+0xc8/0xe0
   ip_rcv+0xe5/0x1d0
   ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10
   __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xce/0xe0
   ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   __netif_receive_skb+0x34/0xd0
   ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   process_backlog+0x2cb/0x9f0
   __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x61/0x280
   net_rx_action+0x332/0x670
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   handle_softirqs+0xda/0x480
   ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450
   do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0
   </IRQ>
   <TASK>
   __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xe0
   ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450
   __dev_queue_xmit+0xa48/0x1450
   ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130
   ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ip_output+0x99/0x120
   __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0
   ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890
   tcp_write_xmit+0x766/0x2fb0
   ? __entry_text_end+0x102ba9/0x102bad
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __might_fault+0x74/0xc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x190
   tcp_push+0x117/0x310
   tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x14c1/0x1740
   tcp_sendmsg+0x28/0x40
   inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x90
   sock_write_iter+0x242/0x2b0
   vfs_write+0x68d/0x800
   ? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10
   ksys_write+0xc8/0xf0
   __x64_sys_write+0x3d/0x50
   x64_sys_call+0xfaf/0x1f50
   do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4d143af992
  Code: c3 8b 07 85 c0 75 24 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> e9 01 cc ff ff 41 54 b8 02 00 00 0
  RSP: 002b:00007ffd65032058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f4d143af992
  RDX: 0000000000000025 RSI: 00007f4d143f3bcc RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f4d143f2b28 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4d143f3bcc
  R13: 0000000000000005 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd650323f0
   </TASK>

Fixes: 0b2c5972 ("l2tp: close all race conditions in l2tp_tunnel_register()")
Suggested-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4
CC: gnault@redhat.com
CC: cong.wang@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240806160626.1248317-1-jchapman@katalix.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 85ba108a
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 13 additions and 2 deletions
net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
View file @ 86a41ea9
......@@ -86,6 +86,11 @@
/* Default trace flags */
#define L2TP_DEFAULT_DEBUG_FLAGS 0
#define L2TP_DEPTH_NESTING 2
#if L2TP_DEPTH_NESTING == SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING
#error "L2TP requires its own lockdep subclass"
#endif
/* Private data stored for received packets in the skb.
*/
struct l2tp_skb_cb {
......@@ -1124,7 +1129,13 @@ static int l2tp_xmit_core(struct l2tp_session *session, struct sk_buff *skb, uns
IPCB(skb)->flags &= ~(IPSKB_XFRM_TUNNEL_SIZE | IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED | IPSKB_REROUTED);
nf_reset_ct(skb);
bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
/* L2TP uses its own lockdep subclass to avoid lockdep splats caused by
* nested socket calls on the same lockdep socket class. This can
* happen when data from a user socket is routed over l2tp, which uses
* another userspace socket.
*/
spin_lock_nested(&sk->sk_lock.slock, L2TP_DEPTH_NESTING);
if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
......@@ -1176,7 +1187,7 @@ static int l2tp_xmit_core(struct l2tp_session *session, struct sk_buff *skb, uns
ret = l2tp_xmit_queue(tunnel, skb, &inet->cork.fl);
out_unlock:
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7