Commit 86d165eb authored by Benjamin Tissoires's avatar Benjamin Tissoires Committed by Zefan Li

HID: logitech-dj: prevent false errors to be shown

commit 5abfe85c upstream.

Commit "HID: logitech: perform bounds checking on device_id early
enough" unfortunately leaks some errors to dmesg which are not real
ones:
- if the report is not a DJ one, then there is not point in checking
  the device_id
- the receiver (index 0) can also receive some notifications which
  can be safely ignored given the current implementation

Move out the test regarding the report_id and also discards
printing errors when the receiver got notified.

Fixes: ad3e14d7Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarMarkus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
parent 2f2c7048
......@@ -681,7 +681,6 @@ static int logi_dj_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
struct dj_report *dj_report = (struct dj_report *) data;
unsigned long flags;
bool report_processed = false;
dbg_hid("%s, size:%d\n", __func__, size);
......@@ -708,34 +707,42 @@ static int logi_dj_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
* device (via hid_input_report() ) and return 1 so hid-core does not do
* anything else with it.
*/
/* case 1) */
if (data[0] != REPORT_ID_DJ_SHORT)
return false;
if ((dj_report->device_index < DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN) ||
(dj_report->device_index > DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX)) {
dev_err(&hdev->dev, "%s: invalid device index:%d\n",
/*
* Device index is wrong, bail out.
* This driver can ignore safely the receiver notifications,
* so ignore those reports too.
*/
if (dj_report->device_index != DJ_RECEIVER_INDEX)
dev_err(&hdev->dev, "%s: invalid device index:%d\n",
__func__, dj_report->device_index);
return false;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&djrcv_dev->lock, flags);
if (dj_report->report_id == REPORT_ID_DJ_SHORT) {
switch (dj_report->report_type) {
case REPORT_TYPE_NOTIF_DEVICE_PAIRED:
case REPORT_TYPE_NOTIF_DEVICE_UNPAIRED:
logi_dj_recv_queue_notification(djrcv_dev, dj_report);
break;
case REPORT_TYPE_NOTIF_CONNECTION_STATUS:
if (dj_report->report_params[CONNECTION_STATUS_PARAM_STATUS] ==
STATUS_LINKLOSS) {
logi_dj_recv_forward_null_report(djrcv_dev, dj_report);
}
break;
default:
logi_dj_recv_forward_report(djrcv_dev, dj_report);
switch (dj_report->report_type) {
case REPORT_TYPE_NOTIF_DEVICE_PAIRED:
case REPORT_TYPE_NOTIF_DEVICE_UNPAIRED:
logi_dj_recv_queue_notification(djrcv_dev, dj_report);
break;
case REPORT_TYPE_NOTIF_CONNECTION_STATUS:
if (dj_report->report_params[CONNECTION_STATUS_PARAM_STATUS] ==
STATUS_LINKLOSS) {
logi_dj_recv_forward_null_report(djrcv_dev, dj_report);
}
report_processed = true;
break;
default:
logi_dj_recv_forward_report(djrcv_dev, dj_report);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&djrcv_dev->lock, flags);
return report_processed;
return true;
}
static int logi_dj_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
......
......@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES 6
#define DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFICATIONS 8
#define DJ_RECEIVER_INDEX 0
#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN 1
#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX 6
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment