Commit 87b4115d authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

PM / OPP: Protect updates to list_dev with mutex

dev_opp_list_lock is used everywhere to protect device and OPP lists,
but dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() is missed somehow. And instead we used
rcu-lock, which wouldn't help here as we are adding a new list_dev.

This also fixes a problem where we have called kzalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL)
from within rcu-lock, which isn't allowed as kzalloc can sleep when
called with GFP_KERNEL.

With CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP set, we get following lockdep-splat:

include/linux/rcupdate.h:578 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
5 locks held by swapper/0/1:
 #0:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02f68f4>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98
 #1:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02f6904>] __driver_attach+0x58/0x98
 #2:  (cpu_hotplug.lock){++++++}, at: [<c00249d0>] get_online_cpus+0x40/0xb0
 #3:  (subsys mutex#5){+.+.+.}, at: [<c02f4f8c>] subsys_interface_register+0x44/0xdc
 #4:  (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<c0305c80>] dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus+0x0/0x1e4

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W       4.3.0-rc7-00047-g81f5932958a8 #59
Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0016874>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001355c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c001355c>] (show_stack) from [<c022553c>] (dump_stack+0x94/0xbc)
[<c022553c>] (dump_stack) from [<c004904c>] (___might_sleep+0x24c/0x298)
[<c004904c>] (___might_sleep) from [<c00f07e4>] (kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x164)
[<c00f07e4>] (kmem_cache_alloc) from [<c0305354>] (_add_list_dev+0x30/0x58)
[<c0305354>] (_add_list_dev) from [<c0305d50>] (dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus+0xd0/0x1e4)
[<c0305d50>] (dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus) from [<c040eda4>] (cpufreq_init+0x4cc/0x62c)
[<c040eda4>] (cpufreq_init) from [<c040a964>] (cpufreq_online+0xbc/0x73c)
[<c040a964>] (cpufreq_online) from [<c02f4fe0>] (subsys_interface_register+0x98/0xdc)
[<c02f4fe0>] (subsys_interface_register) from [<c040a640>] (cpufreq_register_driver+0x110/0x17c)
[<c040a640>] (cpufreq_register_driver) from [<c040ef64>] (dt_cpufreq_probe+0x60/0x8c)
[<c040ef64>] (dt_cpufreq_probe) from [<c02f8084>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
[<c02f8084>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c02f67c0>] (driver_probe_device+0x208/0x2f4)
[<c02f67c0>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c02f6940>] (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
[<c02f6940>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02f4c1c>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x9c)
Reported-by: default avatarMichael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.3 <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 1794ec1f
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
*/
static LIST_HEAD(dev_opp_list);
/* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert() \
do { \
......
......@@ -127,12 +127,12 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
struct device *dev;
int cpu, ret = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
dev_opp = _find_device_opp(cpu_dev);
if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_rcu_read_unlock;
goto unlock;
}
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
......@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
continue;
}
}
out_rcu_read_unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
/* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
extern struct mutex dev_opp_list_lock;
/*
* Internal data structure organization with the OPP layer library is as
* follows:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment