fsverity: remove hash page spin lock

The spin lock is not necessary here as it can be replaced with
memory barrier which should be better performance-wise.

When Merkle tree block size differs from page size, in
is_hash_block_verified() two things are modified during check - a
bitmap and PG_checked flag of the page.

Each bit in the bitmap represent verification status of the Merkle
tree blocks. PG_checked flag tells if page was just re-instantiated
or was in pagecache. Both of this states are shared between
verification threads. Page which was re-instantiated can not have
already verified blocks (bit set in bitmap).

The spin lock was used to allow only one thread to modify both of
these states and keep order of operations. The only requirement here
is that PG_Checked is set strictly after bitmap is updated.
This way other threads which see that PG_Checked=1 (page cached)
knows that bitmap is up-to-date. Otherwise, if PG_Checked is set
before bitmap is cleared, other threads can see bit=1 and therefore
will not perform verification of that Merkle tree block.

However, there's still the case when one thread is setting a bit in
verify_data_block() and other thread is clearing it in
is_hash_block_verified(). This can happen if two threads get to
!PageChecked branch and one of the threads is rescheduled before
resetting the bitmap. This is fine as at worst blocks are
re-verified in each thread.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
[ebiggers: improved the comment and removed the 'verified' variable]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201052813.68380-1-ebiggers@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

fs/verity/fsverity_private.h

@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ struct fsverity_info {
 	u8 file_digest[FS_VERITY_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
 	const struct inode *inode;
 	unsigned long *hash_block_verified;
-	spinlock_t hash_page_init_lock;
 };
 
 #define FS_VERITY_MAX_SIGNATURE_SIZE	(FS_VERITY_MAX_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE - \

fs/verity/open.c

@@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ struct fsverity_info *fsverity_create_info(const struct inode *inode,
 			err = -ENOMEM;
 			goto fail;
 		}
-		spin_lock_init(&vi->hash_page_init_lock);
 	}
 
 	return vi;

fs/verity/verify.c

@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *fsverity_read_workqueue;
 static bool is_hash_block_verified(struct fsverity_info *vi, struct page *hpage,
 				   unsigned long hblock_idx)
 {
-	bool verified;
 	unsigned int blocks_per_page;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -43,12 +42,20 @@ static bool is_hash_block_verified(struct fsverity_info *vi, struct page *hpage,
 	 * re-instantiated from the backing storage are re-verified.  To do
 	 * this, we use PG_checked again, but now it doesn't really mean
 	 * "checked".  Instead, now it just serves as an indicator for whether
-	 * the hash page is newly instantiated or not.
+	 * the hash page is newly instantiated or not.  If the page is new, as
+	 * indicated by PG_checked=0, we clear the bitmap bits for the page's
+	 * blocks since they are untrustworthy, then set PG_checked=1.
+	 * Otherwise we return the bitmap bit for the requested block.
 	 *
-	 * The first thread that sees PG_checked=0 must clear the corresponding
-	 * bitmap bits, then set PG_checked=1.  This requires a spinlock.  To
-	 * avoid having to take this spinlock in the common case of
-	 * PG_checked=1, we start with an opportunistic lockless read.
+	 * Multiple threads may execute this code concurrently on the same page.
+	 * This is safe because we use memory barriers to ensure that if a
+	 * thread sees PG_checked=1, then it also sees the associated bitmap
+	 * clearing to have occurred.  Also, all writes and their corresponding
+	 * reads are atomic, and all writes are safe to repeat in the event that
+	 * multiple threads get into the PG_checked=0 section.  (Clearing a
+	 * bitmap bit again at worst causes a hash block to be verified
+	 * redundantly.  That event should be very rare, so it's not worth using
+	 * a lock to avoid.  Setting PG_checked again has no effect.)
 	 */
 	if (PageChecked(hpage)) {
 		/*
@@ -58,24 +65,17 @@ static bool is_hash_block_verified(struct fsverity_info *vi, struct page *hpage,
 		smp_rmb();
 		return test_bit(hblock_idx, vi->hash_block_verified);
 	}
-	spin_lock(&vi->hash_page_init_lock);
-	if (PageChecked(hpage)) {
-		verified = test_bit(hblock_idx, vi->hash_block_verified);
-	} else {
-		blocks_per_page = vi->tree_params.blocks_per_page;
-		hblock_idx = round_down(hblock_idx, blocks_per_page);
-		for (i = 0; i < blocks_per_page; i++)
-			clear_bit(hblock_idx + i, vi->hash_block_verified);
-		/*
-		 * A write memory barrier is needed here to give RELEASE
-		 * semantics to the below SetPageChecked() operation.
-		 */
-		smp_wmb();
-		SetPageChecked(hpage);
-		verified = false;
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&vi->hash_page_init_lock);
-	return verified;
+	blocks_per_page = vi->tree_params.blocks_per_page;
+	hblock_idx = round_down(hblock_idx, blocks_per_page);
+	for (i = 0; i < blocks_per_page; i++)
+		clear_bit(hblock_idx + i, vi->hash_block_verified);
+	/*
+	 * A write memory barrier is needed here to give RELEASE semantics to
+	 * the below SetPageChecked() operation.
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	SetPageChecked(hpage);
+	return false;
 }
 
 /*