Commit 8ea9183d authored by Vincent Guittot's avatar Vincent Guittot Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched/fair: Cleanup newidle_balance

update_next_balance() uses sd->last_balance which is not modified by
load_balance() so we can merge the 2 calls in one place.

No functional change
Signed-off-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019123537.17146-6-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
parent c5b0a7ee
......@@ -10916,10 +10916,10 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
int continue_balancing = 1;
u64 domain_cost;
if (this_rq->avg_idle < curr_cost + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost) {
update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
if (this_rq->avg_idle < curr_cost + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost)
break;
}
if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
......@@ -10935,8 +10935,6 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
t0 = t1;
}
update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
/*
* Stop searching for tasks to pull if there are
* now runnable tasks on this rq.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment