Commit 9188d5ca authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski Committed by David S. Miller

net/tls: fix refcount adjustment in fallback

Unlike atomic_add(), refcount_add() does not deal well
with a negative argument.  TLS fallback code reallocates
the skb and is very likely to shrink the truesize, leading to:

[  189.513254] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 0 at lib/refcount.c:81 refcount_add_not_zero_checked+0x15c/0x180
 Call Trace:
  refcount_add_checked+0x6/0x40
  tls_enc_skb+0xb93/0x13e0 [tls]

Once wmem_allocated count saturates the application can no longer
send data on the socket.  This is similar to Eric's fixes for GSO,
TCP:
commit 7ec318fe ("tcp: gso: avoid refcount_t warning from tcp_gso_segment()")
and UDP:
commit 575b65bc ("udp: avoid refcount_t saturation in __udp_gso_segment()").

Unlike the GSO case, for TLS fallback it's likely that the skb has
shrunk, so the "likely" annotation is the other way around (likely
branch being "sub").

Fixes: e8f69799 ("net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohn Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e0c1d14a
......@@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ static void update_chksum(struct sk_buff *skb, int headln)
static void complete_skb(struct sk_buff *nskb, struct sk_buff *skb, int headln)
{
struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
int delta;
skb_copy_header(nskb, skb);
skb_put(nskb, skb->len);
......@@ -201,11 +204,15 @@ static void complete_skb(struct sk_buff *nskb, struct sk_buff *skb, int headln)
update_chksum(nskb, headln);
nskb->destructor = skb->destructor;
nskb->sk = skb->sk;
nskb->sk = sk;
skb->destructor = NULL;
skb->sk = NULL;
refcount_add(nskb->truesize - skb->truesize,
&nskb->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
delta = nskb->truesize - skb->truesize;
if (likely(delta < 0))
WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_sub_and_test(-delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
else if (delta)
refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
}
/* This function may be called after the user socket is already
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment