Commit 92425d08 authored by Bagas Sanjaya's avatar Bagas Sanjaya Committed by Jakub Kicinski

Documentation: dpll: Fix code blocks

kernel test robot and Stephen Rothwell report htmldocs warnings:

Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:427: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 18 supplied.

.. code-block:: c
	<snipped>...
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:444: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 21 supplied.

.. code-block:: c
	<snipped>...
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:474: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 12 supplied.

.. code-block:: c
	<snipped>...

Fix these above by adding missing blank line separator after code-block
directive.
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309180456.lOhxy9gS-lkp@intel.com/Reported-by: default avatarStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230918131521.155e9e63@canb.auug.org.au/
Fixes: dbb291f1 ("dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface")
Signed-off-by: default avatarBagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: default avatarRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928052708.44820-2-bagasdotme@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 0e0c52d6
......@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ The simplest implementation is in the OCP TimeCard driver. The ops
structures are defined like this:
.. code-block:: c
static const struct dpll_device_ops dpll_ops = {
.lock_status_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_lock_status_get,
.mode_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_get,
......@@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ structures are defined like this:
The registration part is then looks like this part:
.. code-block:: c
clkid = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0, THIS_MODULE);
if (IS_ERR(bp->dpll)) {
......@@ -472,6 +474,7 @@ The registration part is then looks like this part:
In the error path we have to rewind every allocation in the reverse order:
.. code-block:: c
while (i) {
--i;
dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, &bp->sma[i]);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment