Commit 93a30947 authored by Sabrina Dubroca's avatar Sabrina Dubroca Committed by David S. Miller

macsec: delete new rxsc when offload fails

Currently we get an inconsistent state:
 - netlink returns the error to userspace
 - the RXSC is installed but not offloaded

Then the device could get confused when we try to add an RXSA, because
the RXSC isn't supposed to exist.

Fixes: 3cf3227a ("net: macsec: hardware offloading infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: default avatarSabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAntoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8bcd560a
......@@ -1876,7 +1876,6 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
struct macsec_rx_sc *rx_sc;
struct nlattr *tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_MAX + 1];
struct macsec_secy *secy;
bool was_active;
int ret;
if (!attrs[MACSEC_ATTR_IFINDEX])
......@@ -1904,7 +1903,6 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return PTR_ERR(rx_sc);
}
was_active = rx_sc->active;
if (tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE])
rx_sc->active = !!nla_get_u8(tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE]);
......@@ -1931,7 +1929,8 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return 0;
cleanup:
rx_sc->active = was_active;
del_rx_sc(secy, sci);
free_rx_sc(rx_sc);
rtnl_unlock();
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment