Commit 93f976b5 authored by Davidlohr Bueso's avatar Davidlohr Bueso Committed by Linus Torvalds

lib/rhashtable: simplify bucket_table_alloc()

As of ce91f6ee ("mm: kvmalloc does not fallback to vmalloc for
incompatible gfp flags") we can simplify the caller and trust kvzalloc()
to just do the right thing.  For the case of the GFP_ATOMIC context, we
can drop the __GFP_NORETRY flag for obvious reasons, and for the
__GFP_NOWARN case, however, it is changed such that the caller passes the
flag instead of making bucket_table_alloc() handle it.

This slightly changes the gfp flags passed on to nested_table_alloc() as
it will now also use GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN.  However, I consider this
a positive consequence as for the same reasons we want nowarn semantics in
bucket_table_alloc().

[manfred@colorfullife.com: commit id extended to 12 digits, line wraps updated]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180712185241.4017-8-manfred@colorfullife.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarManfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 82061c57
......@@ -174,10 +174,7 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht,
int i;
size = sizeof(*tbl) + nbuckets * sizeof(tbl->buckets[0]);
if (gfp != GFP_KERNEL)
tbl = kzalloc(size, gfp | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);
else
tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp);
tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp);
size = nbuckets;
......@@ -450,7 +447,7 @@ static int rhashtable_insert_rehash(struct rhashtable *ht,
err = -ENOMEM;
new_tbl = bucket_table_alloc(ht, size, GFP_ATOMIC);
new_tbl = bucket_table_alloc(ht, size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (new_tbl == NULL)
goto fail;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment