Commit 940ce73b authored by Martin KaFai Lau's avatar Martin KaFai Lau Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Remove the insn_buf array stack usage from the inline_bpf_loop()

This patch removes the insn_buf array stack usage from the
inline_bpf_loop(). Instead, the env->insn_buf is used. The
usage in inline_bpf_loop() needs more than 16 insn, so the
INSN_BUF_SIZE needs to be increased from 16 to 32.
The compiler stack size warning on the verifier is gone
after this change.

Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904180847.56947-2-martin.lau@linux.devSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 46f4ea04
......@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
*/
#define TMP_STR_BUF_LEN 320
/* Patch buffer size */
#define INSN_BUF_SIZE 16
#define INSN_BUF_SIZE 32
/* Liveness marks, used for registers and spilled-regs (in stack slots).
* Read marks propagate upwards until they find a write mark; they record that
......
......@@ -21232,7 +21232,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog *inline_bpf_loop(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
int position,
s32 stack_base,
u32 callback_subprogno,
u32 *cnt)
u32 *total_cnt)
{
s32 r6_offset = stack_base + 0 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
s32 r7_offset = stack_base + 1 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
......@@ -21241,55 +21241,56 @@ static struct bpf_prog *inline_bpf_loop(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
int reg_loop_cnt = BPF_REG_7;
int reg_loop_ctx = BPF_REG_8;
struct bpf_insn *insn_buf = env->insn_buf;
struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
u32 callback_start;
u32 call_insn_offset;
s32 callback_offset;
u32 cnt = 0;
/* This represents an inlined version of bpf_iter.c:bpf_loop,
* be careful to modify this code in sync.
*/
struct bpf_insn insn_buf[] = {
/* Return error and jump to the end of the patch if
* expected number of iterations is too big.
*/
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_MAX_LOOPS, 2),
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -E2BIG),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 16),
/* spill R6, R7, R8 to use these as loop vars */
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, r6_offset),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7, r7_offset),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_8, r8_offset),
/* initialize loop vars */
BPF_MOV64_REG(reg_loop_max, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_MOV32_IMM(reg_loop_cnt, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(reg_loop_ctx, BPF_REG_3),
/* loop header,
* if reg_loop_cnt >= reg_loop_max skip the loop body
*/
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, reg_loop_cnt, reg_loop_max, 5),
/* callback call,
* correct callback offset would be set after patching
*/
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, reg_loop_cnt),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, reg_loop_ctx),
BPF_CALL_REL(0),
/* increment loop counter */
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, reg_loop_cnt, 1),
/* jump to loop header if callback returned 0 */
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, -6),
/* return value of bpf_loop,
* set R0 to the number of iterations
*/
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, reg_loop_cnt),
/* restore original values of R6, R7, R8 */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, r6_offset),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, r7_offset),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_10, r8_offset),
};
*cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, position, insn_buf, *cnt);
/* Return error and jump to the end of the patch if
* expected number of iterations is too big.
*/
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_MAX_LOOPS, 2);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -E2BIG);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 16);
/* spill R6, R7, R8 to use these as loop vars */
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, r6_offset);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7, r7_offset);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_8, r8_offset);
/* initialize loop vars */
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(reg_loop_max, BPF_REG_1);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(reg_loop_cnt, 0);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(reg_loop_ctx, BPF_REG_3);
/* loop header,
* if reg_loop_cnt >= reg_loop_max skip the loop body
*/
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, reg_loop_cnt, reg_loop_max, 5);
/* callback call,
* correct callback offset would be set after patching
*/
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, reg_loop_cnt);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, reg_loop_ctx);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_CALL_REL(0);
/* increment loop counter */
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, reg_loop_cnt, 1);
/* jump to loop header if callback returned 0 */
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, -6);
/* return value of bpf_loop,
* set R0 to the number of iterations
*/
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, reg_loop_cnt);
/* restore original values of R6, R7, R8 */
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, r6_offset);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, r7_offset);
insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_10, r8_offset);
*total_cnt = cnt;
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, position, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return new_prog;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment