Commit 971e8a98 authored by Jason Low's avatar Jason Low Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched, timer: Provide an atomic 'struct task_cputime' data structure

This patch adds an atomic variant of the 'struct task_cputime' data structure,
which can be used to store and update task_cputime statistics without
needing to do locking.
Suggested-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430251224-5764-5-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 1018016c
......@@ -572,6 +572,23 @@ struct task_cputime {
.sum_exec_runtime = 0, \
}
/*
* This is the atomic variant of task_cputime, which can be used for
* storing and updating task_cputime statistics without locking.
*/
struct task_cputime_atomic {
atomic64_t utime;
atomic64_t stime;
atomic64_t sum_exec_runtime;
};
#define INIT_CPUTIME_ATOMIC \
(struct task_cputime_atomic) { \
.utime = ATOMIC64_INIT(0), \
.stime = ATOMIC64_INIT(0), \
.sum_exec_runtime = ATOMIC64_INIT(0), \
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
#define PREEMPT_DISABLED (1 + PREEMPT_ENABLED)
#else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment