Commit 9e511c31 authored by Emmanuel Grumbach's avatar Emmanuel Grumbach Committed by Johannes Berg

iwlwifi: mvm: beautify code in BT Coex

The iterators don't need to know what bt_kill_msk means.
All they need to know is if reduced Tx power is enabled
on an interface or not. So change the member of the
iterator to be a bool.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
parent 1da80e80
......@@ -335,9 +335,9 @@ static int iwl_mvm_bt_coex_reduced_txp(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, u8 sta_id,
struct iwl_bt_iterator_data {
struct iwl_bt_coex_profile_notif *notif;
enum iwl_bt_kill_msk bt_kill_msk;
struct iwl_mvm *mvm;
u32 num_bss_ifaces;
bool reduced_tx_power;
};
static void iwl_mvm_bt_notif_iterator(void *_data, u8 *mac,
......@@ -393,9 +393,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_bt_notif_iterator(void *_data, u8 *mac,
/* ... cancel reduced Tx power ... */
if (iwl_mvm_bt_coex_reduced_txp(mvm, mvmvif->ap_sta_id, false))
IWL_ERR(mvm, "Couldn't send BT_CONFIG cmd\n");
/* ... use default values for bt_kill_msk ... */
data->bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT;
data->reduced_tx_power = false;
/* ... and there is no need to get reports on RSSI any more. */
ieee80211_disable_rssi_reports(vif);
......@@ -426,7 +424,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_bt_notif_iterator(void *_data, u8 *mac,
* One interface hasn't rssi above threshold, bt_kill_msk must
* be set to default values.
*/
data->bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT;
data->reduced_tx_power = false;
}
/* Begin to monitor the RSSI: it may influence the reduced Tx power */
......@@ -440,9 +438,8 @@ static void iwl_mvm_new_bt_coex_notif(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
struct iwl_bt_iterator_data data = {
.mvm = mvm,
.notif = notif,
.bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_REDUCED_TXPOW,
.reduced_tx_power = true,
};
bool reduced_tx_power;
/* remember this notification for future use: rssi fluctuations */
memcpy(&mvm->last_bt_notif, notif, sizeof(mvm->last_bt_notif));
......@@ -456,13 +453,9 @@ static void iwl_mvm_new_bt_coex_notif(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
* irrelevant since it is based on the RSSI coming from the beacon.
* Use BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT in that case.
*/
if (!data.num_bss_ifaces)
data.bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT;
data.reduced_tx_power = data.reduced_tx_power && data.num_bss_ifaces;
reduced_tx_power = data.num_bss_ifaces &&
data.bt_kill_msk == BT_KILL_MSK_REDUCED_TXPOW;
if (iwl_mvm_bt_udpate_ctrl_kill_msk(mvm, reduced_tx_power))
if (iwl_mvm_bt_udpate_ctrl_kill_msk(mvm, data.reduced_tx_power))
IWL_ERR(mvm, "Failed to update the ctrl_kill_msk\n");
}
......@@ -515,7 +508,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_iterator(void *_data, u8 *mac,
* RSSI probably), then set bt_kill_msk to default values.
*/
if (!mvmsta->bt_reduced_txpower)
data->bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT;
data->reduced_tx_power = false;
/* else - possibly leave it to BT_KILL_MSK_REDUCED_TXPOW */
}
......@@ -523,10 +516,9 @@ void iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_event(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
enum ieee80211_rssi_event rssi_event)
{
struct iwl_mvm_vif *mvmvif = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
bool reduced_tx_power;
struct iwl_bt_iterator_data data = {
.mvm = mvm,
.bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_REDUCED_TXPOW,
.reduced_tx_power = true,
};
int ret;
......@@ -565,13 +557,9 @@ void iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_event(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
* irrelevant since it is based on the RSSI coming from the beacon.
* Use BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT in that case.
*/
if (!data.num_bss_ifaces)
data.bt_kill_msk = BT_KILL_MSK_DEFAULT;
reduced_tx_power = data.num_bss_ifaces &&
data.bt_kill_msk == BT_KILL_MSK_REDUCED_TXPOW;
data.reduced_tx_power = data.reduced_tx_power && data.num_bss_ifaces;
if (iwl_mvm_bt_udpate_ctrl_kill_msk(mvm, reduced_tx_power))
if (iwl_mvm_bt_udpate_ctrl_kill_msk(mvm, data.reduced_tx_power))
IWL_ERR(mvm, "Failed to update the ctrl_kill_msk\n");
out_unlock:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment