scsi: message: fusion: Avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage
Like commit c4f135d6 ("workqueue: Wrap flush_workqueue() using a macro") says, flush_scheduled_work() is dangerous and will be forbidden. Commit 4d4109d0 ("[SCSI] mpt fusion: Power Management fixes for MPT SAS PCI-E controllers") added flush_scheduled_work() call into mptscsih_suspend(). As of commit 4d4109d0, there were several schedule{,_delayed}_work() calls where flush_scheduled_work() from mptscsih_suspend() meant to wait for completion. However, which work items this flush_scheduled_work() call was for was not explained. Then, schedule_work("struct mptsas_hotplug_event"->work) and schedule_work(MPT_ADAPTER->sas_persist_task) have been removed by commit 3eb0822c ("[SCSI] mpt fusion: Firmware event implementation using seperate WorkQueue"), and schedule_work("struct mptsas_send_discovery_event"->work) has been removed by commit f9c34022 ("[SCSI] mpt fusion: SAS topology scan changes, expander events"). There still remains schedule_work("struct work_queue_wrapper"->work) call in mptspi.c and schedule_delayed_work("struct mpt_lan_priv"->work) call in mptlan.c , but I guess that these are not work items which commit 4d4109d0 meant to wait for completion because these are not per MPT_ADAPTER work items. If my guess is correct, we no longer need to call flush_scheduled_work() from mptscsih_suspend(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0b9ebcfb-b647-1381-0653-b54528a64a86@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jpSigned-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment