Commit a7444af6 authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools: Collapse first level callchain entry if it has sibling

If first level callchain has more than single path like when -g caller
option is given, it should show only first one in the path and hide
others.  But it didn't do it properly and just hindered the output.

Before:
  -   80.33%    11.11%  abc2     abc2              [.] main
     + 86.18% main
       13.82% __libc_start_main
          main

After:
  -   80.33%    11.11%  abc2     abc2              [.] main
     + 86.18% main
     + 13.82% __libc_start_main
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416816807-6495-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 4087d11c
...@@ -227,10 +227,14 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children_rb_tree(struct callchain_node *no ...@@ -227,10 +227,14 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children_rb_tree(struct callchain_node *no
} }
} }
static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct callchain_node *node) static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct callchain_node *node,
bool has_sibling)
{ {
struct callchain_list *chain; struct callchain_list *chain;
chain = list_entry(node->val.next, struct callchain_list, list);
chain->ms.has_children = has_sibling;
if (!list_empty(&node->val)) { if (!list_empty(&node->val)) {
chain = list_entry(node->val.prev, struct callchain_list, list); chain = list_entry(node->val.prev, struct callchain_list, list);
chain->ms.has_children = !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&node->rb_root); chain->ms.has_children = !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&node->rb_root);
...@@ -241,11 +245,12 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct callchain_node *node) ...@@ -241,11 +245,12 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct callchain_node *node)
static void callchain__init_have_children(struct rb_root *root) static void callchain__init_have_children(struct rb_root *root)
{ {
struct rb_node *nd; struct rb_node *nd = rb_first(root);
bool has_sibling = nd && rb_next(nd);
for (nd = rb_first(root); nd; nd = rb_next(nd)) { for (nd = rb_first(root); nd; nd = rb_next(nd)) {
struct callchain_node *node = rb_entry(nd, struct callchain_node, rb_node); struct callchain_node *node = rb_entry(nd, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
callchain_node__init_have_children(node); callchain_node__init_have_children(node, has_sibling);
} }
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment