Commit a86b845b authored by Jiri Kosina's avatar Jiri Kosina Committed by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878232

commit 838fe188 upstream.

cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling
try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op.

In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623e
("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()"), it's perfectly
valid / legal for cleaner_kthread() to stay scheduled out in an arbitrary
place during suspend (in that particular example that was waiting for
reading of extent pages), so there is no need to leave any traces of
freezer in this kthread.

Fixes: 80ad623e ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()")
Fixes: 69624913 ("btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIan May <ian.may@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
parent 141a1fbb
......@@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ static int cleaner_kthread(void *arg)
*/
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(root->fs_info);
sleep:
if (!try_to_freeze() && !again) {
if (!again) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!kthread_should_stop())
schedule();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment