Commit a87010ef authored by Barry Song's avatar Barry Song Committed by Olof Johansson

irqchip: sirf: set IRQ_LEVEL status_flags

SiRF internal interrupts are using level trigger. we need to tell the irq
core this information. otherwise, we might get some problems as below
1. disable_irq(n)
here irq core will mark the disabled flag but still keep the irq enabled
due to involved lazy-disable
2. doing someting after disable_irq(n)
in step 2, if one interrupt n comes, irq core will mark it as pending and
mask the HW interrupt really. we name the coming interrupt as "X".
3. enable_irq(n)
this will unmask the interrupt, so the level-trigger HW interrupt will come
again, irq_handler will enter as "E1". after that, irq core will also check
whether irq n is pending, if yes, and pending interrupt is not level-trigger,
irq core will execute the pending irq_handler.
so if we don't set the IRQ_LEVEL flag here, irq core will execute pending
X again as "E2", but actually the pending interrupt has been handled by "E1".
that makes a level-trigger HW interrupt is executed twice.

here we fix the issue to avoid redundant interrupt overload.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBarry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHuayi Li <Huayi.Li@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
parent b93a35b1
......@@ -34,9 +34,10 @@ sirfsoc_alloc_gc(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start, unsigned int num)
struct irq_chip_type *ct;
int ret;
unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
unsigned int set = IRQ_LEVEL;
ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(sirfsoc_irqdomain, num, 1, "irq_sirfsoc",
handle_level_irq, clr, 0, IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE);
handle_level_irq, clr, set, IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE);
gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(sirfsoc_irqdomain, irq_start);
gc->reg_base = base;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment