Commit ab30f78c authored by Julia Lawall's avatar Julia Lawall Committed by Benjamin Herrenschmidt

powerpc/pmac/windfarm: Correct potential double free

The conditionals were testing different values, but then all freeing the
same one, which could result in a double free.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression x,e;
identifier f;
iterator I;
statement S;
@@

*kfree(x);
... when != &x
    when != x = e
    when != I(x,...) S
*x
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
parent 637a9902
...@@ -687,12 +687,9 @@ static int __devexit wf_smu_remove(struct platform_device *ddev) ...@@ -687,12 +687,9 @@ static int __devexit wf_smu_remove(struct platform_device *ddev)
wf_put_control(cpufreq_clamp); wf_put_control(cpufreq_clamp);
/* Destroy control loops state structures */ /* Destroy control loops state structures */
if (wf_smu_slots_fans) kfree(wf_smu_slots_fans);
kfree(wf_smu_cpu_fans); kfree(wf_smu_drive_fans);
if (wf_smu_drive_fans) kfree(wf_smu_cpu_fans);
kfree(wf_smu_cpu_fans);
if (wf_smu_cpu_fans)
kfree(wf_smu_cpu_fans);
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment