Commit ac52f6f5 authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by Luis Henriques

Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after extent_same ioctl

commit 113e8283 upstream.

If we pass a length of 0 to the extent_same ioctl, we end up locking an
extent range with a start offset greater then its end offset (if the
destination file's offset is greater than zero). This results in a warning
from extent_io.c:insert_state through the following call chain:

  btrfs_extent_same()
    btrfs_double_lock()
      lock_extent_range()
        lock_extent(inode->io_tree, offset, offset + len - 1)
          lock_extent_bits()
            __set_extent_bit()
              insert_state()
                --> WARN_ON(end < start)

This leads to an infinite loop when evicting the inode. This is the same
problem that my previous patch titled
"Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" addressed
but for the extent_same ioctl instead of the clone ioctl.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
parent 9ee588e8
......@@ -2941,6 +2941,9 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
if (src == dst)
return -EINVAL;
if (len == 0)
return 0;
btrfs_double_lock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, len);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment