Commit ac7dbb99 authored by Lars-Peter Clausen's avatar Lars-Peter Clausen Committed by Linus Walleij

gpio: GPIO_GET_LINEEVENT_IOCTL: Reject invalid line and event flags

The GPIO_GET_LINEEVENT_IOCTL currently ignores unknown or undefined
linehandle and lineevent flags. From a backwards and forwards compatibility
viewpoint it is highly desirable to reject unknown flags though.

On one hand an application that is using newer flags and is running on
an older kernel has no way to detect if the new flags were handled
correctly if they are silently discarded.

On the other hand an application that (accidentally) passes undefined flags
will run fine on an older kernel, but may break on a newer kernel when
these flags get defined.

Ensure that requests that have undefined flags set are rejected with an
error, rather than silently discarding the undefined flags.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 61f922db ("gpio: userspace ABI for reading GPIO line events")
Signed-off-by: default avatarLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent e3e847c7
......@@ -556,6 +556,10 @@ struct lineevent_state {
struct mutex read_lock;
};
#define GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_VALID_FLAGS \
(GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_RISING_EDGE | \
GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_FALLING_EDGE)
static unsigned int lineevent_poll(struct file *filep,
struct poll_table_struct *wait)
{
......@@ -753,6 +757,13 @@ static int lineevent_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip)
goto out_free_label;
}
/* Return an error if a unknown flag is set */
if ((lflags & ~GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_VALID_FLAGS) ||
(eflags & ~GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_VALID_FLAGS)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_free_label;
}
/* This is just wrong: we don't look for events on output lines */
if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OUTPUT) {
ret = -EINVAL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment