Commit ad0b8b9e authored by Lee Jones's avatar Lee Jones Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: gpio-regulator: Fix logical error in for() loop

The cond-statement of this particular for() loop will always be
true as long as at least one voltage-shifting GPIO is present.
If it wasn't for the break below, we'd be stuck in a forever loop.
This patch inserts the correct cond-statement into the statement.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
parent ec4f7b88
...@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) ...@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
if (!config->gpios) if (!config->gpios)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
for (i = 0; config->nr_gpios; i++) { for (i = 0; i < config->nr_gpios; i++) {
gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpios", i); gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpios", i);
if (gpio < 0) if (gpio < 0)
break; break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment