Commit adda60cc authored by Florian Westphal's avatar Florian Westphal

netfilter: nat: avoid long-running port range loop

Looping a large port range takes too long. Instead select a random
offset within [ntohs(exp->saved_proto.tcp.port), 65535] and try 128
ports.

This is a rehash of an erlier patch to do the same, but generalized
to handle other helpers as well.

Link: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20210920204439.13179-2-Cole.Dishington@alliedtelesis.co.nz/Signed-off-by: default avatarFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
parent c92c2717
......@@ -201,8 +201,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_nat_follow_master);
u16 nf_nat_exp_find_port(struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp, u16 port)
{
static const unsigned int max_attempts = 128;
int range, attempts_left;
u16 min = port;
range = USHRT_MAX - port;
attempts_left = range;
if (attempts_left > max_attempts)
attempts_left = max_attempts;
/* Try to get same port: if not, try to change it. */
for (; port != 0; port++) {
for (;;) {
int res;
exp->tuple.dst.u.tcp.port = htons(port);
......@@ -210,8 +220,10 @@ u16 nf_nat_exp_find_port(struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp, u16 port)
if (res == 0)
return port;
if (res != -EBUSY)
if (res != -EBUSY || (--attempts_left < 0))
break;
port = min + prandom_u32_max(range);
}
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment