Commit ae4c24b2 authored by Suraj Jitindar Singh's avatar Suraj Jitindar Singh Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

powerpc/mm: Correct process and partition table max size

commit 555c1632 upstream.

Version 3.00 of the ISA states that the PATS (partition table size) field
of the PTCR (partition table control register) and the PRTS (process table
size) field of the partition table entry must both be less than or equal
to 24. However the actual size of the partition and process tables is equal
to 2 to the power of 12 plus the PATS and PRTS fields, respectively. This
means that the max allowable size of each of these tables is 2^36 or 64GB
for both.

Thus when checking the size shift for each we should be checking for values
of greater than 36 instead of the current check for shifts larger than 24
and 23.

Fixes: 2bfd65e4Signed-off-by: default avatarSuraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBalbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 42eded92
......@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void __init radix_init_pgtable(void)
* Allocate Partition table and process table for the
* host.
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((PRTB_SIZE_SHIFT > 23), "Process table size too large.");
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((PRTB_SIZE_SHIFT > 36), "Process table size too large.");
process_tb = early_alloc_pgtable(1UL << PRTB_SIZE_SHIFT);
/*
* Fill in the process table.
......@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void __init radix_init_partition_table(void)
rts_field = radix__get_tree_size();
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((PATB_SIZE_SHIFT > 24), "Partition table size too large.");
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((PATB_SIZE_SHIFT > 36), "Partition table size too large.");
partition_tb = early_alloc_pgtable(1UL << PATB_SIZE_SHIFT);
partition_tb->patb0 = cpu_to_be64(rts_field | __pa(init_mm.pgd) |
RADIX_PGD_INDEX_SIZE | PATB_HR);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment