Commit b3a3b025 authored by Naohiro Aota's avatar Naohiro Aota Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: zoned: drop optimization of zone finish

We have an optimization in do_zone_finish() to send REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH only
when necessary, i.e. we don't send REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH when we assume we
wrote fully into the zone.

The assumption is determined by "alloc_offset == capacity". This condition
won't work if the last ordered extent is canceled due to some errors. In
that case, we consider the zone is deactivated without sending the finish
command while it's still active.

This inconstancy results in activating another block group while we cannot
really activate the underlying zone, which causes the active zone exceeds
errors like below.

    BTRFS error (device nvme3n2): allocation failed flags 1, wanted 520192 tree-log 0, relocation: 0
    nvme3n2: I/O Cmd(0x7d) @ LBA 160432128, 127 blocks, I/O Error (sct 0x1 / sc 0xbd) MORE DNR
    active zones exceeded error, dev nvme3n2, sector 0 op 0xd:(ZONE_APPEND) flags 0x4800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
    nvme3n2: I/O Cmd(0x7d) @ LBA 160432128, 127 blocks, I/O Error (sct 0x1 / sc 0xbd) MORE DNR
    active zones exceeded error, dev nvme3n2, sector 0 op 0xd:(ZONE_APPEND) flags 0x4800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0

Fix the issue by removing the optimization for now.

Fixes: 8376d9e1 ("btrfs: zoned: finish superblock zone once no space left for new SB")
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 29634578
...@@ -1889,7 +1889,6 @@ static int do_zone_finish(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, bool fully_writ ...@@ -1889,7 +1889,6 @@ static int do_zone_finish(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, bool fully_writ
{ {
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
struct map_lookup *map; struct map_lookup *map;
bool need_zone_finish;
int ret = 0; int ret = 0;
int i; int i;
...@@ -1946,12 +1945,6 @@ static int do_zone_finish(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, bool fully_writ ...@@ -1946,12 +1945,6 @@ static int do_zone_finish(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, bool fully_writ
} }
} }
/*
* The block group is not fully allocated, so not fully written yet. We
* need to send ZONE_FINISH command to free up an active zone.
*/
need_zone_finish = !btrfs_zoned_bg_is_full(block_group);
block_group->zone_is_active = 0; block_group->zone_is_active = 0;
block_group->alloc_offset = block_group->zone_capacity; block_group->alloc_offset = block_group->zone_capacity;
block_group->free_space_ctl->free_space = 0; block_group->free_space_ctl->free_space = 0;
...@@ -1967,15 +1960,13 @@ static int do_zone_finish(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, bool fully_writ ...@@ -1967,15 +1960,13 @@ static int do_zone_finish(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, bool fully_writ
if (device->zone_info->max_active_zones == 0) if (device->zone_info->max_active_zones == 0)
continue; continue;
if (need_zone_finish) { ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(device->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(device->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH, physical >> SECTOR_SHIFT,
physical >> SECTOR_SHIFT, device->zone_info->zone_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT,
device->zone_info->zone_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT, GFP_NOFS);
GFP_NOFS);
if (ret) if (ret)
return ret; return ret;
}
btrfs_dev_clear_active_zone(device, physical); btrfs_dev_clear_active_zone(device, physical);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment