drm/i915: Squelch any ktime/jiffie rounding errors for wait-ioctl

commit 89cf83d4 upstream.

We wait upon jiffies, but report the time elapsed using a
high-resolution timer. This discrepancy can lead to us timing out the
wait prior to us reporting the elapsed time as complete.

This restores the squelching lost in commit e95433c7 ("drm/i915:
Rearrange i915_wait_request() accounting with callers").

Fixes: e95433c7 ("drm/i915: Rearrange i915_wait_request() accounting with callers")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170216125441.30923-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit c1d2061b)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c

@@ -3003,6 +3003,16 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 		args->timeout_ns -= ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start));
 		if (args->timeout_ns < 0)
 			args->timeout_ns = 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * Apparently ktime isn't accurate enough and occasionally has a
+		 * bit of mismatch in the jiffies<->nsecs<->ktime loop. So patch
+		 * things up to make the test happy. We allow up to 1 jiffy.
+		 *
+		 * This is a regression from the timespec->ktime conversion.
+		 */
+		if (ret == -ETIME && !nsecs_to_jiffies(args->timeout_ns))
+			args->timeout_ns = 0;
 	}
 
 	i915_gem_object_put(obj);