Commit b945efcd authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched: Remove pointless preemption disable in sched_submit_work()

Neither wq_worker_sleeping() nor io_wq_worker_sleeping() require to be invoked
with preemption disabled:

  - The worker flag checks operations only need to be serialized against
    the worker thread itself.

  - The accounting and worker pool operations are serialized with locks.

which means that disabling preemption has neither a reason nor a
value. Remove it and update the stale comment.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8735pnafj7.ffs@tglx
parent 670721c7
......@@ -6251,20 +6251,14 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
task_flags = tsk->flags;
/*
* If a worker went to sleep, notify and ask workqueue whether
* it wants to wake up a task to maintain concurrency.
* As this function is called inside the schedule() context,
* we disable preemption to avoid it calling schedule() again
* in the possible wakeup of a kworker and because wq_worker_sleeping()
* requires it.
* If a worker goes to sleep, notify and ask workqueue whether it
* wants to wake up a task to maintain concurrency.
*/
if (task_flags & (PF_WQ_WORKER | PF_IO_WORKER)) {
preempt_disable();
if (task_flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
else
io_wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
preempt_enable_no_resched();
}
if (tsk_is_pi_blocked(tsk))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment