Commit b9ab0517 authored by Linus Walleij's avatar Linus Walleij

i2c: gpio: Local vars in probe

By creating local variables for *dev and *np, the code become
much easier to read, in my opinion.
Tested-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent 4d0ce62c
......@@ -88,10 +88,12 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct i2c_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
struct i2c_algo_bit_data *bit_data;
struct i2c_adapter *adap;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
enum gpiod_flags gflags;
int ret;
priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;
......@@ -99,16 +101,15 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
bit_data = &priv->bit_data;
pdata = &priv->pdata;
if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
of_i2c_gpio_get_props(pdev->dev.of_node, pdata);
if (np) {
of_i2c_gpio_get_props(np, pdata);
} else {
/*
* If all platform data settings are zero it is OK
* to not provide any platform data from the board.
*/
if (dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev))
memcpy(pdata, dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev),
sizeof(*pdata));
if (dev_get_platdata(dev))
memcpy(pdata, dev_get_platdata(dev), sizeof(*pdata));
}
/*
......@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
else
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH_OPEN_DRAIN;
priv->sda = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, 0, gflags);
priv->sda = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 0, gflags);
if (IS_ERR(priv->sda)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(priv->sda);
/* FIXME: hack in the old code, is this really necessary? */
......@@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
else
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW_OPEN_DRAIN;
priv->scl = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, 1, gflags);
priv->scl = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 1, gflags);
if (IS_ERR(priv->scl)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(priv->scl);
/* FIXME: hack in the old code, is this really necessary? */
......@@ -173,15 +174,15 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
bit_data->data = priv;
adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
if (pdev->dev.of_node)
strlcpy(adap->name, dev_name(&pdev->dev), sizeof(adap->name));
if (np)
strlcpy(adap->name, dev_name(dev), sizeof(adap->name));
else
snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-gpio%d", pdev->id);
adap->algo_data = bit_data;
adap->class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON | I2C_CLASS_SPD;
adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
adap->dev.parent = dev;
adap->dev.of_node = np;
adap->nr = pdev->id;
ret = i2c_bit_add_numbered_bus(adap);
......@@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* get accessors to get the actual name of the GPIO line,
* from the descriptor, then provide that instead.
*/
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "using lines %u (SDA) and %u (SCL%s)\n",
dev_info(dev, "using lines %u (SDA) and %u (SCL%s)\n",
desc_to_gpio(priv->sda), desc_to_gpio(priv->scl),
pdata->scl_is_output_only
? ", no clock stretching" : "");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment