Commit b9e0805a authored by Michael Ellerman's avatar Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Add build-time check of ptrace PT_xx defines

As part of the uapi we export a lot of PT_xx defines for each register
in struct pt_regs. These are expressed as an index from gpr[0], in
units of unsigned long.

Currently there's nothing tying the values of those defines to the
actual layout of the struct.

But we *don't* want to change the uapi defines to derive the PT_xx
values based on the layout of the struct, those values are ABI and
must never change.

Instead we want to do the reverse, make sure that the layout of the
struct never changes vs the PT_xx defines. So add build time checks of
that.

This probably seems paranoid, but at least once in the past someone
has sent a patch that would have broken the ABI if it hadn't been
spotted. Although it probably would have been detected via testing,
it's preferable to just quash any issues at the source.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191030111231.22720-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
parent 5c74f799
......@@ -3404,4 +3404,67 @@ void __init pt_regs_check(void)
offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, result));
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) > sizeof(struct pt_regs));
// Now check that the pt_regs offsets match the uapi #defines
#define CHECK_REG(_pt, _reg) \
BUILD_BUG_ON(_pt != (offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, _reg) / \
sizeof(unsigned long)));
CHECK_REG(PT_R0, gpr[0]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R1, gpr[1]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R2, gpr[2]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R3, gpr[3]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R4, gpr[4]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R5, gpr[5]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R6, gpr[6]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R7, gpr[7]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R8, gpr[8]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R9, gpr[9]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R10, gpr[10]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R11, gpr[11]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R12, gpr[12]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R13, gpr[13]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R14, gpr[14]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R15, gpr[15]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R16, gpr[16]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R17, gpr[17]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R18, gpr[18]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R19, gpr[19]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R20, gpr[20]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R21, gpr[21]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R22, gpr[22]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R23, gpr[23]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R24, gpr[24]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R25, gpr[25]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R26, gpr[26]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R27, gpr[27]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R28, gpr[28]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R29, gpr[29]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R30, gpr[30]);
CHECK_REG(PT_R31, gpr[31]);
CHECK_REG(PT_NIP, nip);
CHECK_REG(PT_MSR, msr);
CHECK_REG(PT_ORIG_R3, orig_gpr3);
CHECK_REG(PT_CTR, ctr);
CHECK_REG(PT_LNK, link);
CHECK_REG(PT_XER, xer);
CHECK_REG(PT_CCR, ccr);
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
CHECK_REG(PT_SOFTE, softe);
#else
CHECK_REG(PT_MQ, mq);
#endif
CHECK_REG(PT_TRAP, trap);
CHECK_REG(PT_DAR, dar);
CHECK_REG(PT_DSISR, dsisr);
CHECK_REG(PT_RESULT, result);
#undef CHECK_REG
BUILD_BUG_ON(PT_REGS_COUNT != sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) / sizeof(unsigned long));
/*
* PT_DSCR isn't a real reg, but it's important that it doesn't overlap the
* real registers.
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON(PT_DSCR < sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) / sizeof(unsigned long));
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment