Commit bbf27275 authored by Josef Bacik's avatar Josef Bacik Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: add self test for bytes_index free space cache

I noticed a few corner cases when looking at my bytes_index patch for
obvious bugs, so add a bunch of tests to validate proper behavior of the
bytes_index tree.  A couple of basic tests to make sure it puts things
in the correct order, and then more complicated tests to make sure it
re-arranges bitmap entries properly and does the right thing when we try
to make allocations.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 59c7b566
......@@ -824,6 +824,184 @@ test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
return 0;
}
static bool bytes_index_use_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
struct btrfs_free_space *info)
{
return true;
}
static int test_bytes_index(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, u32 sectorsize)
{
const struct btrfs_free_space_op test_free_space_ops = {
.use_bitmap = bytes_index_use_bitmap,
};
const struct btrfs_free_space_op *orig_free_space_ops;
struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl = cache->free_space_ctl;
struct btrfs_free_space *entry;
struct rb_node *node;
u64 offset, max_extent_size, bytes;
int ret, i;
test_msg("running bytes index tests");
/* First just validate that it does everything in order. */
offset = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
bytes = (i + 1) * SZ_1M;
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, offset, bytes, 0);
if (ret) {
test_err("couldn't add extent entry %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
offset += bytes + sectorsize;
}
for (node = rb_first_cached(&ctl->free_space_bytes), i = 9; node;
node = rb_next(node), i--) {
entry = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_free_space, bytes_index);
bytes = (i + 1) * SZ_1M;
if (entry->bytes != bytes) {
test_err("invalid bytes index order, found %llu expected %llu",
entry->bytes, bytes);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
/* Now validate bitmaps do the correct thing. */
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
offset = i * BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize;
bytes = (i + 1) * SZ_1M;
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, offset, bytes, 1);
if (ret) {
test_err("couldn't add bitmap entry");
return ret;
}
}
for (node = rb_first_cached(&ctl->free_space_bytes), i = 1; node;
node = rb_next(node), i--) {
entry = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_free_space, bytes_index);
bytes = (i + 1) * SZ_1M;
if (entry->bytes != bytes) {
test_err("invalid bytes index order, found %llu expected %llu",
entry->bytes, bytes);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
/* Now validate bitmaps with different ->max_extent_size. */
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
orig_free_space_ops = cache->free_space_ctl->op;
cache->free_space_ctl->op = &test_free_space_ops;
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 0, sectorsize, 1);
if (ret) {
test_err("couldn't add bitmap entry");
return ret;
}
offset = BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize;
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, offset, sectorsize, 1);
if (ret) {
test_err("couldn't add bitmap_entry");
return ret;
}
/*
* Now set a bunch of sectorsize extents in the first entry so it's
* ->bytes is large.
*/
for (i = 2; i < 20; i += 2) {
offset = sectorsize * i;
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, offset, sectorsize);
if (ret) {
test_err("error populating sparse bitmap %d", ret);
return ret;
}
}
/*
* Now set a contiguous extent in the second bitmap so its
* ->max_extent_size is larger than the first bitmaps.
*/
offset = (BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize) + sectorsize;
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, offset, sectorsize);
if (ret) {
test_err("error adding contiguous extent %d", ret);
return ret;
}
/*
* Since we don't set ->max_extent_size unless we search everything
* should be indexed on bytes.
*/
entry = rb_entry(rb_first_cached(&ctl->free_space_bytes),
struct btrfs_free_space, bytes_index);
if (entry->bytes != (10 * sectorsize)) {
test_err("error, wrong entry in the first slot in bytes_index");
return -EINVAL;
}
max_extent_size = 0;
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache, cache->start, sectorsize * 3,
0, &max_extent_size);
if (offset != 0) {
test_err("found space to alloc even though we don't have enough space");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (max_extent_size != (2 * sectorsize)) {
test_err("got the wrong max_extent size %llu expected %llu",
max_extent_size, (unsigned long long)(2 * sectorsize));
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* The search should have re-arranged the bytes index to use the
* ->max_extent_size, validate it's now what we expect it to be.
*/
entry = rb_entry(rb_first_cached(&ctl->free_space_bytes),
struct btrfs_free_space, bytes_index);
if (entry->bytes != (2 * sectorsize)) {
test_err("error, the bytes index wasn't recalculated properly");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Add another sectorsize to re-arrange the tree back to ->bytes. */
offset = (BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize) - sectorsize;
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, offset, sectorsize);
if (ret) {
test_err("error adding extent to the sparse entry %d", ret);
return ret;
}
entry = rb_entry(rb_first_cached(&ctl->free_space_bytes),
struct btrfs_free_space, bytes_index);
if (entry->bytes != (11 * sectorsize)) {
test_err("error, wrong entry in the first slot in bytes_index");
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* Now make sure we find our correct entry after searching that will
* result in a re-arranging of the tree.
*/
max_extent_size = 0;
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache, cache->start, sectorsize * 2,
0, &max_extent_size);
if (offset != (BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize)) {
test_err("error, found %llu instead of %llu for our alloc",
offset,
(unsigned long long)(BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize));
return -EINVAL;
}
cache->free_space_ctl->op = orig_free_space_ops;
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
return 0;
}
int btrfs_test_free_space_cache(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
......@@ -871,6 +1049,9 @@ int btrfs_test_free_space_cache(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
goto out;
ret = test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(cache, sectorsize);
if (ret)
goto out;
ret = test_bytes_index(cache, sectorsize);
out:
btrfs_free_dummy_block_group(cache);
btrfs_free_dummy_root(root);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment