Commit bdd1666b authored by Jin Yao's avatar Jin Yao Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf annotate: Remove hist__account_cycles() from callback

The hist__account_cycles() function is executed when the
hist_iter__branch_callback() is called.

But it looks it's not necessary.  In hist__account_cycles, it already
walks on all branch entries.

This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.

Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++ (in
__symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback, so
the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).

With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps (in
annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be hidden.

Now, we can try, for example:

  perf record -b ...
  perf annotate or perf report -s symbol

The before/after output should be no change.

 v3:
 ---
 Fix the crash in stdio mode.
 Like previous code, it needs the checking of ui__has_annotation()
 before hist__account_cycles()

 v2:
 ---
 1. Cover the similar perf report
 2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"
Signed-off-by: default avatarJin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552684577-29041-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 6b89d4c1
......@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
int err;
hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
bi = he->branch_info;
err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
......@@ -199,6 +197,8 @@ static int process_branch_callback(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
if (a.map != NULL)
a.map->dso->hit = 1;
hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &a, PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, ann);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static int hist_iter__report_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
return 0;
hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
rep->nonany_branch_mode);
if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
bi = he->branch_info;
err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
......@@ -181,9 +178,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
return 0;
hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
rep->nonany_branch_mode);
bi = he->branch_info;
err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
if (err)
......@@ -282,6 +276,11 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (al.map != NULL)
al.map->dso->hit = 1;
if (ui__has_annotation() || rep->symbol_ipc) {
hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, &al, sample,
rep->nonany_branch_mode);
}
ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &al, rep->max_stack, rep);
if (ret < 0)
pr_debug("problem adding hist entry, skipping event\n");
......
......@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation *notes, u64 start, u64
float ipc = n_insn / ((double)ch->cycles / (double)ch->num);
/* Hide data when there are too many overlaps. */
if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff || ch->reset >= ch->num / 2)
if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff)
return;
for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment