Commit be80ff88 authored by Lars Ellenberg's avatar Lars Ellenberg Committed by Jens Axboe

drbd: avoid spurious self-outdating with concurrent disconnect / down

If peers are "simultaneously" told to disconnect from each other,
either explicitly, or implicitly by taking down the resource,
with bad timing, one side may see its disconnect "fail" with
a result of "state change failed by peer", and interpret this as
"please oudate yourself".

Try to catch this by checking for current connection status,
and possibly retry as local-only state change instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent f708bd08
......@@ -2711,8 +2711,10 @@ int drbd_adm_connect(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
static enum drbd_state_rv conn_try_disconnect(struct drbd_connection *connection, bool force)
{
enum drbd_conns cstate;
enum drbd_state_rv rv;
repeat:
rv = conn_request_state(connection, NS(conn, C_DISCONNECTING),
force ? CS_HARD : 0);
......@@ -2730,6 +2732,11 @@ static enum drbd_state_rv conn_try_disconnect(struct drbd_connection *connection
break;
case SS_CW_FAILED_BY_PEER:
spin_lock_irq(&connection->resource->req_lock);
cstate = connection->cstate;
spin_unlock_irq(&connection->resource->req_lock);
if (cstate <= C_WF_CONNECTION)
goto repeat;
/* The peer probably wants to see us outdated. */
rv = conn_request_state(connection, NS2(conn, C_DISCONNECTING,
disk, D_OUTDATED), 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment