Commit be9f97f0 authored by David Herrmann's avatar David Herrmann Committed by Gustavo Padovan

Bluetooth: change bt_sock_unregister() to return void

There is no reason a caller ever wants to check the return type of this
call. _Iff_ a user successfully called bt_sock_register(), they're allowed
to call bt_sock_unregister().
All other calls in the kernel (device_del, device_unregister, kfree(), ..)
that are logically equivalent return void. Lets not make callers think
they have to check the return type of this call and instead simply return
void.

We guarantee that after bt_sock_unregister() is called, the socket type
_is_ unregistered. If that is not what the caller wants, they're using the
wrong function, anyway.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
parent 5e9d7f86
......@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ struct bt_sock_list {
};
int bt_sock_register(int proto, const struct net_proto_family *ops);
int bt_sock_unregister(int proto);
void bt_sock_unregister(int proto);
void bt_sock_link(struct bt_sock_list *l, struct sock *s);
void bt_sock_unlink(struct bt_sock_list *l, struct sock *s);
int bt_sock_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
......
......@@ -92,23 +92,14 @@ int bt_sock_register(int proto, const struct net_proto_family *ops)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_sock_register);
int bt_sock_unregister(int proto)
void bt_sock_unregister(int proto)
{
int err = 0;
if (proto < 0 || proto >= BT_MAX_PROTO)
return -EINVAL;
return;
write_lock(&bt_proto_lock);
if (!bt_proto[proto])
err = -ENOENT;
else
bt_proto[proto] = NULL;
bt_proto[proto] = NULL;
write_unlock(&bt_proto_lock);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_sock_unregister);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment