Commit bfad380c authored by Nirmoy Das's avatar Nirmoy Das

drm/i915/active: Fix missing debug object activation

debug_active_activate() expected ref->count to be zero
which is not true anymore as __i915_active_activate() calls
debug_active_activate() after incrementing the count.

v2: No need to check for "ref->count == 1" as __i915_active_activate()
already make sure of that(Janusz).

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6733
Fixes: 04240e30 ("drm/i915: Skip taking acquire mutex for no ref->active callback")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230313114613.9874-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com
parent c8a76df6
......@@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ static void debug_active_init(struct i915_active *ref)
static void debug_active_activate(struct i915_active *ref)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&ref->tree_lock);
if (!atomic_read(&ref->count)) /* before the first inc */
debug_object_activate(ref, &active_debug_desc);
debug_object_activate(ref, &active_debug_desc);
}
static void debug_active_deactivate(struct i915_active *ref)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment