Commit c4d1d11f authored by Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)'s avatar Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) Committed by Steven Rostedt

ktest: Put back in the CONFIG_BISECT_CHECK

The new rewrite left out the CONFIG_BISECT_CHECK, which allows the
user to test that their "bad" config still is bad and their "good"
config still is good. This is especially important as the configs
are passed through a "make oldconfig" to update them with the lastest
kernel. Things could change that causes a bad config to work, or a
good config to break. The check is done after the configs have run
through the oldconfig processing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
parent 6071c22e
......@@ -3125,6 +3125,7 @@ sub config_bisect {
my ($i) = @_;
my $type = $config_bisect_type;
my $ret;
$bad_config = $config_bisect;
......@@ -3134,7 +3135,7 @@ sub config_bisect {
$good_config = $minconfig;
} else {
doprint "No config specified, checking if defconfig works";
my $ret = run_bisect_test $type, "defconfig";
$ret = run_bisect_test $type, "defconfig";
if (!$ret) {
fail "Have no good config to compare with, please set CONFIG_BISECT_GOOD";
return 1;
......@@ -3166,7 +3167,27 @@ sub config_bisect {
save_config \%good_configs, $good_config;
save_config \%bad_configs, $bad_config;
my $ret;
if (defined($config_bisect_check) && $config_bisect_check ne "0") {
if ($config_bisect_check ne "good") {
doprint "Testing bad config\n";
$ret = run_bisect_test $type, "useconfig:$bad_config";
if ($ret) {
fail "Bad config succeeded when expected to fail!";
return 0;
}
}
if ($config_bisect_check ne "bad") {
doprint "Testing good config\n";
$ret = run_bisect_test $type, "useconfig:$good_config";
if (!$ret) {
fail "Good config failed when expected to succeed!";
return 0;
}
}
}
do {
$ret = run_config_bisect \%good_configs, \%bad_configs;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment