Commit c64d6615 authored by Wei Yang's avatar Wei Yang Committed by Andrew Morton

maple_tree: fix comment typo with corresponding maple_status

In comment of function mas_start(), we list the return value of different
cases.  According to the comment context, tell the maple_status here is
more consistent with others.

Let's correct it with ma_active in the case it's a tree.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240812150925.31551-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarWei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLiam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 7a0529d0
...@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ static void mas_node_count(struct ma_state *mas, int count) ...@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ static void mas_node_count(struct ma_state *mas, int count)
* - If mas->node is an error or not mas_start, return NULL. * - If mas->node is an error or not mas_start, return NULL.
* - If it's an empty tree: NULL & mas->status == ma_none * - If it's an empty tree: NULL & mas->status == ma_none
* - If it's a single entry: The entry & mas->status == ma_root * - If it's a single entry: The entry & mas->status == ma_root
* - If it's a tree: NULL & mas->status == safe root node. * - If it's a tree: NULL & mas->status == ma_active
*/ */
static inline struct maple_enode *mas_start(struct ma_state *mas) static inline struct maple_enode *mas_start(struct ma_state *mas)
{ {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment