Commit c7603cfa authored by Andrii Nakryiko's avatar Andrii Nakryiko Committed by Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Add ambient BPF runtime context stored in current

b910eaaa ("bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_get_local_storage()
helper") fixed the problem with cgroup-local storage use in BPF by
pre-allocating per-CPU array of 8 cgroup storage pointers to accommodate
possible BPF program preemptions and nested executions.

While this seems to work good in practice, it introduces new and unnecessary
failure mode in which not all BPF programs might be executed if we fail to
find an unused slot for cgroup storage, however unlikely it is. It might also
not be so unlikely when/if we allow sleepable cgroup BPF programs in the
future.

Further, the way that cgroup storage is implemented as ambiently-available
property during entire BPF program execution is a convenient way to pass extra
information to BPF program and helpers without requiring user code to pass
around extra arguments explicitly. So it would be good to have a generic
solution that can allow implementing this without arbitrary restrictions.
Ideally, such solution would work for both preemptable and sleepable BPF
programs in exactly the same way.

This patch introduces such solution, bpf_run_ctx. It adds one pointer field
(bpf_ctx) to task_struct. This field is maintained by BPF_PROG_RUN family of
macros in such a way that it always stays valid throughout BPF program
execution. BPF program preemption is handled by remembering previous
current->bpf_ctx value locally while executing nested BPF program and
restoring old value after nested BPF program finishes. This is handled by two
helper functions, bpf_set_run_ctx() and bpf_reset_run_ctx(), which are
supposed to be used before and after BPF program runs, respectively.

Restoring old value of the pointer handles preemption, while bpf_run_ctx
pointer being a property of current task_struct naturally solves this problem
for sleepable BPF programs by "following" BPF program execution as it is
scheduled in and out of CPU. It would even allow CPU migration of BPF
programs, even though it's not currently allowed by BPF infra.

This patch cleans up cgroup local storage handling as a first application. The
design itself is generic, though, with bpf_run_ctx being an empty struct that
is supposed to be embedded into a specific struct for a given BPF program type
(bpf_cg_run_ctx in this case). Follow up patches are planned that will expand
this mechanism for other uses within tracing BPF programs.

To verify that this change doesn't revert the fix to the original cgroup
storage issue, I ran the same repro as in the original report ([0]) and didn't
get any problems. Replacing bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx) with
bpf_reset_run_ctx(NULL) triggers the issue pretty quickly (so repro does work).

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YEEvBUiJl2pJkxTd@krava/

Fixes: b910eaaa ("bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_get_local_storage() helper")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210712230615.3525979-1-andrii@kernel.org
parent d4861fc6
......@@ -27,19 +27,6 @@ struct task_struct;
extern struct static_key_false cgroup_bpf_enabled_key[MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE];
#define cgroup_bpf_enabled(type) static_branch_unlikely(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key[type])
#define BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX 8
struct bpf_cgroup_storage_info {
struct task_struct *task;
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE];
};
/* For each cpu, permit maximum BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX number of tasks
* to use bpf cgroup storage simultaneously.
*/
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_info,
bpf_cgroup_storage_info[BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX]);
#define for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype) \
for (stype = 0; stype < MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE; stype++)
......@@ -172,44 +159,6 @@ static inline enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type cgroup_storage_type(
return BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED;
}
static inline int bpf_cgroup_storage_set(struct bpf_cgroup_storage
*storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE])
{
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
int i, err = 0;
preempt_disable();
for (i = 0; i < BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX; i++) {
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != NULL))
continue;
this_cpu_write(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task, current);
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
this_cpu_write(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].storage[stype],
storage[stype]);
goto out;
}
err = -EBUSY;
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
out:
preempt_enable();
return err;
}
static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_unset(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX; i++) {
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != current))
continue;
this_cpu_write(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task, NULL);
return;
}
}
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *
cgroup_storage_lookup(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map,
void *key, bool locked);
......@@ -487,9 +436,6 @@ static inline int cgroup_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
return -EINVAL;
}
static inline int bpf_cgroup_storage_set(
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE]) { return 0; }
static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_unset(void) {}
static inline int bpf_cgroup_storage_assign(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux,
struct bpf_map *map) { return 0; }
static inline struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(
......
......@@ -1142,38 +1142,40 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array *old_array,
struct bpf_prog *include_prog,
struct bpf_prog_array **new_array);
struct bpf_run_ctx {};
struct bpf_cg_run_ctx {
struct bpf_run_ctx run_ctx;
struct bpf_prog_array_item *prog_item;
};
/* BPF program asks to bypass CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE in bind. */
#define BPF_RET_BIND_NO_CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE (1 << 0)
/* BPF program asks to set CN on the packet. */
#define BPF_RET_SET_CN (1 << 0)
/* For BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_FLAGS and __BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY,
* if bpf_cgroup_storage_set() failed, the rest of programs
* will not execute. This should be a really rare scenario
* as it requires BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX number of
* preemptions all between bpf_cgroup_storage_set() and
* bpf_cgroup_storage_unset() on the same cpu.
*/
#define BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_FLAGS(array, ctx, func, ret_flags) \
({ \
struct bpf_prog_array_item *_item; \
struct bpf_prog *_prog; \
struct bpf_prog_array *_array; \
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx; \
struct bpf_cg_run_ctx run_ctx; \
u32 _ret = 1; \
u32 func_ret; \
migrate_disable(); \
rcu_read_lock(); \
_array = rcu_dereference(array); \
_item = &_array->items[0]; \
old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx); \
while ((_prog = READ_ONCE(_item->prog))) { \
if (unlikely(bpf_cgroup_storage_set(_item->cgroup_storage))) \
break; \
run_ctx.prog_item = _item; \
func_ret = func(_prog, ctx); \
_ret &= (func_ret & 1); \
*(ret_flags) |= (func_ret >> 1); \
bpf_cgroup_storage_unset(); \
*(ret_flags) |= (func_ret >> 1); \
_item++; \
} \
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx); \
rcu_read_unlock(); \
migrate_enable(); \
_ret; \
......@@ -1184,6 +1186,8 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array *old_array,
struct bpf_prog_array_item *_item; \
struct bpf_prog *_prog; \
struct bpf_prog_array *_array; \
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx; \
struct bpf_cg_run_ctx run_ctx; \
u32 _ret = 1; \
migrate_disable(); \
rcu_read_lock(); \
......@@ -1191,17 +1195,13 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array *old_array,
if (unlikely(check_non_null && !_array))\
goto _out; \
_item = &_array->items[0]; \
while ((_prog = READ_ONCE(_item->prog))) { \
if (!set_cg_storage) { \
_ret &= func(_prog, ctx); \
} else { \
if (unlikely(bpf_cgroup_storage_set(_item->cgroup_storage))) \
break; \
_ret &= func(_prog, ctx); \
bpf_cgroup_storage_unset(); \
} \
old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);\
while ((_prog = READ_ONCE(_item->prog))) { \
run_ctx.prog_item = _item; \
_ret &= func(_prog, ctx); \
_item++; \
} \
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx); \
_out: \
rcu_read_unlock(); \
migrate_enable(); \
......@@ -1284,6 +1284,20 @@ static inline void bpf_enable_instrumentation(void)
migrate_enable();
}
static inline struct bpf_run_ctx *bpf_set_run_ctx(struct bpf_run_ctx *new_ctx)
{
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_ctx;
old_ctx = current->bpf_ctx;
current->bpf_ctx = new_ctx;
return old_ctx;
}
static inline void bpf_reset_run_ctx(struct bpf_run_ctx *old_ctx)
{
current->bpf_ctx = old_ctx;
}
extern const struct file_operations bpf_map_fops;
extern const struct file_operations bpf_prog_fops;
extern const struct file_operations bpf_iter_fops;
......
......@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct backing_dev_info;
struct bio_list;
struct blk_plug;
struct bpf_local_storage;
struct bpf_run_ctx;
struct capture_control;
struct cfs_rq;
struct fs_struct;
......@@ -1379,6 +1380,8 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
/* Used by BPF task local storage */
struct bpf_local_storage __rcu *bpf_storage;
/* Used for BPF run context */
struct bpf_run_ctx *bpf_ctx;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
......
......@@ -393,8 +393,6 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_ancestor_cgroup_id_proto = {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_info,
bpf_cgroup_storage_info[BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX]);
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_local_storage, struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags)
{
......@@ -403,17 +401,13 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_local_storage, struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags)
* verifier checks that its value is correct.
*/
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype = cgroup_storage_type(map);
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage = NULL;
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
struct bpf_cg_run_ctx *ctx;
void *ptr;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX; i++) {
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != current))
continue;
storage = this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].storage[stype]);
break;
}
/* get current cgroup storage from BPF run context */
ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_cg_run_ctx, run_ctx);
storage = ctx->prog_item->cgroup_storage[stype];
if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED)
ptr = &READ_ONCE(storage->buf)->data[0];
......
......@@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_info,
bpf_cgroup_storage_info[BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX]);
#include "../cgroup/cgroup-internal.h"
#define LOCAL_STORAGE_CREATE_FLAG_MASK \
......
......@@ -2083,6 +2083,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
RCU_INIT_POINTER(p->bpf_storage, NULL);
p->bpf_ctx = NULL;
#endif
/* Perform scheduler related setup. Assign this task to a CPU. */
......
......@@ -88,17 +88,19 @@ static bool bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t, u32 repeat, int *e
static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat,
u32 *retval, u32 *time, bool xdp)
{
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = { NULL };
struct bpf_prog_array_item item = {.prog = prog};
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_ctx;
struct bpf_cg_run_ctx run_ctx;
struct bpf_test_timer t = { NO_MIGRATE };
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
int ret;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype) {
storage[stype] = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog, stype);
if (IS_ERR(storage[stype])) {
storage[stype] = NULL;
item.cgroup_storage[stype] = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog, stype);
if (IS_ERR(item.cgroup_storage[stype])) {
item.cgroup_storage[stype] = NULL;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]);
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(item.cgroup_storage[stype]);
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
......@@ -107,22 +109,19 @@ static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat,
repeat = 1;
bpf_test_timer_enter(&t);
old_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
do {
ret = bpf_cgroup_storage_set(storage);
if (ret)
break;
run_ctx.prog_item = &item;
if (xdp)
*retval = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, ctx);
else
*retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
bpf_cgroup_storage_unset();
} while (bpf_test_timer_continue(&t, repeat, &ret, time));
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_ctx);
bpf_test_timer_leave(&t);
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]);
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(item.cgroup_storage[stype]);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment