Commit c8b459f4 authored by Lukas Czerner's avatar Lukas Czerner Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: remove unnecessary double parentheses

Signed-off-by: default avatarLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
parent 029b10c5
......@@ -4018,7 +4018,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
allocated, newblock);
/* get_block() before submit the IO, split the extent */
if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)) {
if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO) {
ret = ext4_split_convert_extents(handle, inode, map,
path, flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT);
if (ret <= 0)
......@@ -4036,7 +4036,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
goto out;
}
/* IO end_io complete, convert the filled extent to written */
if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT)) {
if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT) {
ret = ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio(handle, inode, map,
path);
if (ret >= 0) {
......@@ -4475,7 +4475,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
* For non asycn direct IO case, flag the inode state
* that we need to perform conversion when IO is done.
*/
if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO))
if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)
set_unwritten = 1;
}
......
......@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static void ext4_map_blocks_es_recheck(handle_t *handle,
* could be converted.
*/
if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_LOCK))
down_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) {
retval = ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags &
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_KEEP_SIZE);
......@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
* file system block.
*/
if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_LOCK))
down_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) {
retval = ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags &
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_KEEP_SIZE);
......@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
* the write lock of i_data_sem, and call get_blocks()
* with create == 1 flag.
*/
down_write((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
/*
* if the caller is from delayed allocation writeout path
......@@ -1540,7 +1540,7 @@ static int ext4_da_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
ext4_es_lru_add(inode);
if (ext4_es_is_hole(&es)) {
retval = 0;
down_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
goto add_delayed;
}
......@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static int ext4_da_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
* Try to see if we can get the block without requesting a new
* file system block.
*/
down_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) {
/*
* We will soon create blocks for this page, and let
......
......@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ int ext4_ext_migrate(struct inode *inode)
* with i_data_sem held to prevent racing with block
* allocation.
*/
down_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_EXT_MIGRATE);
up_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
......
......@@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@ static int ext4_setup_super(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_super_block *es,
if (!(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_VALID_FS))
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "warning: mounting unchecked fs, "
"running e2fsck is recommended");
else if ((sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS))
else if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS)
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING,
"warning: mounting fs with errors, "
"running e2fsck is recommended");
......
......@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
* take i_data_sem because we will test
* i_delalloc_reserved_flag in ext4_mb_new_blocks
*/
down_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
block = ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle, inode, goal, 0,
NULL, &error);
up_read((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment