Commit cb764a69 authored by Will Deacon's avatar Will Deacon

arm64: debug: Remove meaningless comment

The comment next to the definition of our 'break_hook' list head is
at best wrong but mainly just meaningless. Rip it out.
Reviewed-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
parent 5a9132ad
......@@ -264,11 +264,6 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned int esr,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(single_step_handler);
/*
* Breakpoint handler is re-entrant as another breakpoint can
* hit within breakpoint handler, especically in kprobes.
* Use reader/writer locks instead of plain spinlock.
*/
static LIST_HEAD(break_hook);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(break_hook_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment