drm/i915: irq handlers don't need interrupt-safe spinlocks
Since we only have one interrupt handler and interrupt handlers are non-reentrant. To drive the point really home give them all an _irq_handler suffix. This is a tiny micro-optimization but even more important it makes it clearer what locking we actually need. And in case someone screws this up: lockdep will catch hardirq vs. other context deadlocks. v2: Fix up compile fail. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment