sfc: Take mac_lock before calling efx_ef10_filter_table_probe
When trying to enslave an SFC interface to a bond the following BUG_ON was hit: kernel BUG [in ef10.c]! CPU: 0 PID: 4383 Comm: ifenslave Tainted: G ... Call Trace: efx_ef10_filter_add_vlan+0x121/0x180 [sfc] efx_ef10_filter_table_probe+0x2a2/0x4f0 [sfc] efx_ef10_set_mac_address+0x370/0x6d0 [sfc] efx_set_mac_address+0x7d/0x120 [sfc] dev_set_mac_address+0x43/0xa0 bond_enslave+0x337/0xea0 [bonding] This comes from function efx_ef10_filter_vlan_sync_rx_mode. To solve the bug we ensure the mac_lock is taken before calling efx_ef10_filter_add_vlan. But to avoid a priority inversion mac_lock must be taken before filter_sem. To satisfy these requirements we end up taking mac_lock in efx_ef10_vport_set_mac_address, efx_ef10_set_mac_address, efx_ef10_sriov_set_vf_vlan and efx_probe_filters. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment