Commit d355001f authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_any_held() instead of rcu_read_lock_held()

The different flavors of RCU read critical sections have been unified. Let's
update the locking assertion macros accordingly to avoid requiring
unnecessary explicit rcu_read_[un]lock() calls.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
parent c7a40c49
......@@ -515,12 +515,12 @@ static void show_one_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool);
#include <trace/events/workqueue.h>
#define assert_rcu_or_pool_mutex() \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
"RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
"RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment