Commit d6ee3576 authored by Sam Ravnborg's avatar Sam Ravnborg

kconfig: rename E_OR & friends to avoid name clash

We had macros named the same as a set of enumeration values.
It is legal code but very confusing to read - so rename
the macros from E_* to EXPR_*
Signed-off-by: default avatarSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
parent d84876f9
......@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int conf_read_simple(const char *name, int def)
cs->def[def].val = sym;
break;
}
cs->def[def].tri = E_OR(cs->def[def].tri, sym->def[def].tri);
cs->def[def].tri = EXPR_OR(cs->def[def].tri, sym->def[def].tri);
}
}
fclose(in);
......
......@@ -955,14 +955,14 @@ tristate expr_calc_value(struct expr *e)
case E_AND:
val1 = expr_calc_value(e->left.expr);
val2 = expr_calc_value(e->right.expr);
return E_AND(val1, val2);
return EXPR_AND(val1, val2);
case E_OR:
val1 = expr_calc_value(e->left.expr);
val2 = expr_calc_value(e->right.expr);
return E_OR(val1, val2);
return EXPR_OR(val1, val2);
case E_NOT:
val1 = expr_calc_value(e->left.expr);
return E_NOT(val1);
return EXPR_NOT(val1);
case E_EQUAL:
sym_calc_value(e->left.sym);
sym_calc_value(e->right.sym);
......
......@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ struct expr {
union expr_data left, right;
};
#define E_OR(dep1, dep2) (((dep1)>(dep2))?(dep1):(dep2))
#define E_AND(dep1, dep2) (((dep1)<(dep2))?(dep1):(dep2))
#define E_NOT(dep) (2-(dep))
#define EXPR_OR(dep1, dep2) (((dep1)>(dep2))?(dep1):(dep2))
#define EXPR_AND(dep1, dep2) (((dep1)<(dep2))?(dep1):(dep2))
#define EXPR_NOT(dep) (2-(dep))
struct expr_value {
struct expr *expr;
......
......@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void sym_calc_visibility(struct symbol *sym)
tri = no;
for_all_prompts(sym, prop) {
prop->visible.tri = expr_calc_value(prop->visible.expr);
tri = E_OR(tri, prop->visible.tri);
tri = EXPR_OR(tri, prop->visible.tri);
}
if (tri == mod && (sym->type != S_TRISTATE || modules_val == no))
tri = yes;
......@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym)
if (sym_is_choice_value(sym) && sym->visible == yes) {
prop = sym_get_choice_prop(sym);
newval.tri = (prop_get_symbol(prop)->curr.val == sym) ? yes : no;
} else if (E_OR(sym->visible, sym->rev_dep.tri) != no) {
} else if (EXPR_OR(sym->visible, sym->rev_dep.tri) != no) {
sym->flags |= SYMBOL_WRITE;
if (sym_has_value(sym))
newval.tri = sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri;
......@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym)
if (prop)
newval.tri = expr_calc_value(prop->expr);
}
newval.tri = E_OR(E_AND(newval.tri, sym->visible), sym->rev_dep.tri);
newval.tri = EXPR_OR(EXPR_AND(newval.tri, sym->visible), sym->rev_dep.tri);
} else if (!sym_is_choice(sym)) {
prop = sym_get_default_prop(sym);
if (prop) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment