Commit d8289d3a authored by Will Deacon's avatar Will Deacon Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: tlb: Justify non-leaf invalidation in flush_tlb_range()

Add a comment to explain why we can't get away with last-level
invalidation in flush_tlb_range()
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 0795edaf
...@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, ...@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
static inline void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, static inline void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end) unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{ {
/*
* We cannot use leaf-only invalidation here, since we may be invalidating
* table entries as part of collapsing hugepages or moving page tables.
*/
__flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, false); __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, false);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment