Commit d85a60d8 authored by Bernhard Walle's avatar Bernhard Walle Committed by Linus Torvalds

Add IRQF_IRQPOLL flag (common code)

irqpoll is broken on some architectures that don't use the IRQ 0 for the timer
interrupt like IA64.  This patch adds a IRQF_IRQPOLL flag.

Each architecture is handled in a separate pach.  As I left the irq == 0 as
condition, this should not break existing architectures that use timer_irq ==
0 and that I did't address with that patch (because I don't know).

This patch:

This patch adds a IRQF_IRQPOLL flag that the interrupt registration code could
use for the interrupt it wants to use for IRQ polling.

Because this must not be the timer interrupt, an additional flag was added
instead of re-using the IRQF_TIMER constant.  Until all architectures will
have an IRQF_IRQPOLL interrupt, irq == 0 will stay as alternative as it should
not break anything.

Also, note_interrupt() is called on CPU-specific interrupts to be used as
interrupt source for IRQ polling.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 951744fe
...@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ ...@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
* IRQF_TIMER - Flag to mark this interrupt as timer interrupt * IRQF_TIMER - Flag to mark this interrupt as timer interrupt
* IRQF_PERCPU - Interrupt is per cpu * IRQF_PERCPU - Interrupt is per cpu
* IRQF_NOBALANCING - Flag to exclude this interrupt from irq balancing * IRQF_NOBALANCING - Flag to exclude this interrupt from irq balancing
* IRQF_IRQPOLL - Interrupt is used for polling (only the interrupt that is
* registered first in an shared interrupt is considered for
* performance reasons)
*/ */
#define IRQF_DISABLED 0x00000020 #define IRQF_DISABLED 0x00000020
#define IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM 0x00000040 #define IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM 0x00000040
...@@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ ...@@ -52,6 +55,7 @@
#define IRQF_TIMER 0x00000200 #define IRQF_TIMER 0x00000200
#define IRQF_PERCPU 0x00000400 #define IRQF_PERCPU 0x00000400
#define IRQF_NOBALANCING 0x00000800 #define IRQF_NOBALANCING 0x00000800
#define IRQF_IRQPOLL 0x00001000
/* /*
* Migration helpers. Scheduled for removal in 9/2007 * Migration helpers. Scheduled for removal in 9/2007
......
...@@ -180,6 +180,8 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned int irq) ...@@ -180,6 +180,8 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned int irq)
if (desc->chip->ack) if (desc->chip->ack)
desc->chip->ack(irq); desc->chip->ack(irq);
action_ret = handle_IRQ_event(irq, desc->action); action_ret = handle_IRQ_event(irq, desc->action);
if (!noirqdebug)
note_interrupt(irq, desc, action_ret);
desc->chip->end(irq); desc->chip->end(irq);
return 1; return 1;
} }
......
...@@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, ...@@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
if (unlikely(irqfixup)) { if (unlikely(irqfixup)) {
/* Don't punish working computers */ /* Don't punish working computers */
if ((irqfixup == 2 && irq == 0) || action_ret == IRQ_NONE) { if ((irqfixup == 2 && ((irq == 0) ||
(desc->action->flags & IRQF_IRQPOLL))) ||
action_ret == IRQ_NONE) {
int ok = misrouted_irq(irq); int ok = misrouted_irq(irq);
if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE) if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE)
desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok; desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment