Commit dfcce791 authored by Kirill Tkhai's avatar Kirill Tkhai Committed by Linus Torvalds

fs/exec.c:de_thread: move notify_count write under lock

We set sig->notify_count = -1 between RELEASE and ACQUIRE operations:

	spin_unlock_irq(lock);
	...
	if (!thread_group_leader(tsk)) {
		...
                for (;;) {
			sig->notify_count = -1;
                        write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);

There are no restriction on it so other processors may see this STORE
mixed with other STOREs in both areas limited by the spinlocks.

Probably, it may be reordered with the above

	sig->group_exit_task = tsk;
	sig->notify_count = zap_other_threads(tsk);

in some way.

Set it under tasklist_lock locked to be sure nothing will be reordered.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Acked-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 6e399cd1
......@@ -926,10 +926,14 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (!thread_group_leader(tsk)) {
struct task_struct *leader = tsk->group_leader;
sig->notify_count = -1; /* for exit_notify() */
for (;;) {
threadgroup_change_begin(tsk);
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
/*
* Do this under tasklist_lock to ensure that
* exit_notify() can't miss ->group_exit_task
*/
sig->notify_count = -1;
if (likely(leader->exit_state))
break;
__set_current_state(TASK_KILLABLE);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment