Commit e1b0048e authored by Alexey Dobriyan's avatar Alexey Dobriyan Committed by Steffen Klassert

xfrm: use "unsigned int" in addr_match()

x86_64 is zero-extending arch so "unsigned int" is preferred over "int"
for address calculations and extending to size_t.

Space savings:

	add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-24 (-24)
	function                                     old     new   delta
	xfrm_state_walk                              708     696     -12
	xfrm_selector_match                          918     906     -12
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
parent d7f69466
......@@ -816,12 +816,12 @@ static inline void xfrm_state_hold(struct xfrm_state *x)
}
static inline bool addr_match(const void *token1, const void *token2,
int prefixlen)
unsigned int prefixlen)
{
const __be32 *a1 = token1;
const __be32 *a2 = token2;
int pdw;
int pbi;
unsigned int pdw;
unsigned int pbi;
pdw = prefixlen >> 5; /* num of whole u32 in prefix */
pbi = prefixlen & 0x1f; /* num of bits in incomplete u32 in prefix */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment