Commit e1ed769d authored by Tony Battersby's avatar Tony Battersby Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

sg: fix EWOULDBLOCK errors with scsi-mq

commit 7772855a upstream.

With scsi-mq enabled, userspace programs can get unexpected EWOULDBLOCK
(a.k.a. EAGAIN) errors when submitting commands to the SCSI generic
driver.  Fix by calling blk_get_request() with GFP_KERNEL instead of
GFP_ATOMIC.

Note: to avoid introducing a potential deadlock, this patch should be
applied after the patch titled "sg: fix unkillable I/O wait deadlock
with scsi-mq".
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Tested-by: default avatarDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 09c2814b
......@@ -1695,7 +1695,22 @@ sg_start_req(Sg_request *srp, unsigned char *cmd)
return -ENOMEM;
}
rq = blk_get_request(q, rw, GFP_ATOMIC);
/*
* NOTE
*
* With scsi-mq enabled, there are a fixed number of preallocated
* requests equal in number to shost->can_queue. If all of the
* preallocated requests are already in use, then using GFP_ATOMIC with
* blk_get_request() will return -EWOULDBLOCK, whereas using GFP_KERNEL
* will cause blk_get_request() to sleep until an active command
* completes, freeing up a request. Neither option is ideal, but
* GFP_KERNEL is the better choice to prevent userspace from getting an
* unexpected EWOULDBLOCK.
*
* With scsi-mq disabled, blk_get_request() with GFP_KERNEL usually
* does not sleep except under memory pressure.
*/
rq = blk_get_request(q, rw, GFP_KERNEL);
if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
kfree(long_cmdp);
return PTR_ERR(rq);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment