Commit e27f8bd2 authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: remove redundant 'governor' field from user_policy

Its always same as policy->governor, and there is no need to keep
another copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 14ca0bdf
......@@ -675,7 +675,6 @@ static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return ret;
policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
return count;
}
......@@ -1323,10 +1322,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
goto out_exit_policy;
}
if (new_policy) {
if (new_policy)
policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
}
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
......@@ -2305,7 +2303,6 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min;
new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max;
new_policy.policy = policy->user_policy.policy;
new_policy.governor = policy->user_policy.governor;
/*
* BIOS might change freq behind our back
......
......@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ struct cpufreq_real_policy {
unsigned int min; /* in kHz */
unsigned int max; /* in kHz */
unsigned int policy; /* see above */
struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */
};
struct cpufreq_policy {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment