Commit e51aded9 authored by Kaixin Wang's avatar Kaixin Wang Committed by Jon Mason

ntb: ntb_hw_switchtec: Fix use after free vulnerability in...

ntb: ntb_hw_switchtec: Fix use after free vulnerability in switchtec_ntb_remove due to race condition

In the switchtec_ntb_add function, it can call switchtec_ntb_init_sndev
function, then &sndev->check_link_status_work is bound with
check_link_status_work. switchtec_ntb_link_notification may be called
to start the work.

If we remove the module which will call switchtec_ntb_remove to make
cleanup, it will free sndev through kfree(sndev), while the work
mentioned above will be used. The sequence of operations that may lead
to a UAF bug is as follows:

CPU0                                 CPU1

                        | check_link_status_work
switchtec_ntb_remove    |
kfree(sndev);           |
                        | if (sndev->link_force_down)
                        | // use sndev

Fix it by ensuring that the work is canceled before proceeding with
the cleanup in switchtec_ntb_remove.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKaixin Wang <kxwang23@m.fudan.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLogan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
parent 87a7d715
......@@ -1554,6 +1554,7 @@ static void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev)
switchtec_ntb_deinit_db_msg_irq(sndev);
switchtec_ntb_deinit_shared_mw(sndev);
switchtec_ntb_deinit_crosslink(sndev);
cancel_work_sync(&sndev->check_link_status_work);
kfree(sndev);
dev_info(dev, "ntb device unregistered\n");
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment