Commit e667ee3b authored by Dillon Varone's avatar Dillon Varone Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/amd/display: Use new num clk levels struct for max mclk index

[WHY?]
When calculating watermark and dlg values, the max mclk level index and
associated speed are needed to find the correlated dummy latency value.
Currently the incorrect index is given due to a clock manager refactor.

[HOW?]
Use num_memclk_level from num_entries_per_clk struct for getting the correct max
mem speed.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: default avatarBrian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: default avatarDaniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 2a5dd86a
......@@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ void dcn32_calculate_wm_and_dlg_fpu(struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *context,
if (context->bw_ctx.dml.vba.DRAMClockChangeSupport[vlevel][maxMpcComb] ==
dm_dram_clock_change_unsupported) {
int min_dram_speed_mts_offset = dc->clk_mgr->bw_params->clk_table.num_entries - 1;
int min_dram_speed_mts_offset = dc->clk_mgr->bw_params->clk_table.num_entries_per_clk.num_memclk_levels - 1;
min_dram_speed_mts =
dc->clk_mgr->bw_params->clk_table.entries[min_dram_speed_mts_offset].memclk_mhz * 16;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment