Commit e9c6e797 authored by Cong Wang's avatar Cong Wang Committed by Jakub Kicinski

tcp: fix sock skb accounting in tcp_read_skb()

Before commit 965b57b4 ("net: Introduce a new proto_ops
->read_skb()"), skb was not dequeued from receive queue hence
when we close TCP socket skb can be just flushed synchronously.

After this commit, we have to uncharge skb immediately after being
dequeued, otherwise it is still charged in the original sock. And we
still need to retain skb->sk, as eBPF programs may extract sock
information from skb->sk. Therefore, we have to call
skb_set_owner_sk_safe() here.

Fixes: 965b57b4 ("net: Introduce a new proto_ops ->read_skb()")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+a0e6f8738b58f7654417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: default avatarStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 6faee3d4
...@@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor) ...@@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
int used; int used;
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue); __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
WARN_ON(!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk));
used = recv_actor(sk, skb); used = recv_actor(sk, skb);
if (used <= 0) { if (used <= 0) {
if (!copied) if (!copied)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment